![]() |
Art generated by author's prompt on AI platform Ideogram |
Greenland residents are wise to reject U.S. overtures to take over their island. They can learn from Guam.
Guam has the highest standard of living in Micronesia, largely due to the U.S. military’s impact on the local economy. The military is a major employer and the thousands of troops stationed there help keep the local economy strong. Because the military owns one-third of the island’s landmass, it has invested heavily in infrastructure, ensuring Guam can recover rapidly from storms. But the benefits end there.
The U.S. has eroded Guam's native culture and turned the island into a forward base—positioned on the front lines of potential conflict with China and North Korea. The constant presence of bombers and warships is more likely to make residents feel vulnerable than safe.
Additionally, Guam residents are not represented in Congress and cannot vote in federal elections. They have no political clout whatsoever.
In contrast, Greenland residents enjoy universal and free healthcare funded by the Danish government, along with pensions for retirees and child benefits for families.
Politically Powerless
While there is an independence movement in Guam, the island’s deep economic and security dependence makes separation difficult to imagine. Despite their ties to the U.S., Guam’s residents remain politically powerless.
Greenland may face a similar fate.
If the U.S. increases its military presence there, Greenland’s indigenous culture could be sidelined, and growing militarization may create a climate of stress and uncertainty.
U.S. Political Climate
Another threat comes from U.S. politics. the U.S. political climate—particularly Republican opposition to social programs like single-payer healthcare—may put Greenland’s benefits at risk. Whatever economic advantages Greenland gains from increased U.S. involvement may be offset if the U.S. cuts to its healthcare and other social welfare guarantees.
If the U.S. tells Greenland that it can keep its healthcare under an arrangement with the U.S., don't trust it. The promises the U.S. makes to entice Greenland may prove as unreliable as the assurances China once gave to Hong Kong.